Life listed chronologically

Categories

Archives

Recent Posts

  • More on Feedster (and why I love the web)

    The other day I posted about issues with spam in the search results I was getting at Feedster. Within hours there was not only a post on Scott Johnson’s blog, but I got a nice message from him about how to remove blogspot results from my NetNewsWire searches there. I love to see companies being this on the ball. Especially a place like Feedster. I wasn’t really looking for a solution right that second. I more was commenting how spammers seem to be doing their best to devalue a lot of the usefulness of the web.

    So here’s a quick thanks for the help!

  • Blogger + Feedster + Spammers = Useless

    I use NetNewsWire for reading RSS feeds. One of the great features up till recently has been the ability to have it search places like Feedster and have the results show up as a feed. In the recent past my regular search for anything to do with Pulmonary Fibrosis has achieved nothing more than hugely long posts of spam (click and see). Since the 15th there have been around 27 hits on that search, only ONE of them being an actual post by someone. And all the offending posts have been at blogger.

    I think Blogger needs to do something about this. Have a better way of detecting automated blog signups or something. Currently it has drastically reduced the usefulness of things like Feedster for me. At least Feedster does have the ability to filter out responses from some urls. I just need to see if I can get NNW to support doing that.

  • So Who Gets It?

    This article at the New York Times made me laugh quite a bit this morning:

    Right Name, Wrong E-Mail In-Box

    LAST fall, David A. Green was looking forward to his new job at a Manhattan real estate brokerage. Finally, he would be able to shed the e-mail confusion that plagued him because of the two other David Greens at his company.

    No such luck. At his new company, Cushman & Wakefield, there was yet another David Green. And that Mr. Green already held the coveted e-mail name David_Green, following the company’s convention for e-mail addresses.

    At his old company, CB Richard Ellis, he had been, reluctantly, David.A.Green. Now he became David_A_Green. Hundreds of his e-mail messages went to the wrong David Green.

    “I would have been better off being at his desk than at mine,” said David A. Green, noting that the original, initial-free David Green is “most gracious about sending me the volumes of e-mails that go to him.” [via New York Times: Technology]

    So why did I find this amusing? This isn’t a new topic. The sendmail FAQ has had a question on this forever (or at least since 1997). It still amazes me that people don’t think that this might be a problem. When I was in college pretty much everyone had four character email addresses in the format (first initial)(second initial)(random alphanumeric)(random alphanumeric). Mine was gb1d. I can still remember pretty much all my friend’s addresses from then too. It also helps to keep out people just spamming by sending emails to any old firstname_lastname address.

  • Blizzard Bans Users Who Break Terms of Use

    Joystiq and Game Girl Advance both reported on Blizzard banning accounts that were used for “Gold Farming” over the weekend. For those of you not familiar with the world of MMORPGs, Gold Farming is big business. People go around, and just kill monsters for high priced items and sell it off to make in-game money. They then sell the in-game money on places like ebay for real money. This is also done with rare magic items. The practice has been going on for ages. I remember hearing about people doing the same with Ultima Online and Evercrack.

    The thing I’m finding baffling about both the posts on this is they seem to be coming down hard on Blizzard. Joystiq asks:

    So, you pay for the game, pay your monthly subscription, only for Blizzard to say “you did something we don’t want you to do, goodbye”, and they kill your account. That’s $50 wasted since, as was reported a while back, you can’t transfer the serial number. Once it’s used, it’s used. Where should the line be drawn on what you can and can’t do in a game you pay for initially, and continue to pay for every month? If people are stupid enough to buy a game’s currency for hard cash, why shouldn’t that be a legitimate activity? [Joystiq]

    The answer is simple. You are breaking the policies that Blizzard has set forth for how they will run their game. This was not some secret policy that nobody knew of. On the World of Warcraft Policy Page it’s right at the top of the announcements link. They even say what they will do to people they catch doing it (Of course, this gets to an even larger rant I have about how people don’t read any of the game policies when playing). If this had come out of the blue I’d be able to understand complaints, but it didn’t.

    What do people think? If you are providing a service, should you be able to set the rules for the use of it? Does it matter if it is a game or something like an ISP? Or should having paid money immediately mean you can do what you want with that service, regardless of any Terms of Use?

  • Lazy Spammers

    Phil Ringnalda does some tests to see if spammers are smart enough to grab email addresses that have been escaped as numeric character references. I was surprised to find that spammers weren’t going this little extra mile.

    Spammers are lazy<

    Last July, wanting to prove that simplistic protection of email links by just escaping them as numeric character references (&#097;&#064;&#098;&#046;&#099;&#111;&#109; to produce a@b.com) was a lousy idea — and how could it not be? even without any economic incentive, it wouldn’t take me long to write the code needed to harvest them just fine — I put an encoded SpamMotel address in my sidebar, along with a fresh address in the unprotected part of my accessibly spamproofed address. I figured it wouldn’t take long before the encoded address was getting just as spammed as the other.

    This morning, when I got my third actual email through the encoded one (I guess the “Harvester Test” headline wasn’t quite clear enough), I finally remembered to turn it off and take it out. The final tally, for the encoded address: 46 spams, 3 actual emails; for the unencoded address: 2632 spams. Apparently, if you don’t have time to really harden an address, it’s worth taking the time to at least convert it to NCRs. Lazy spammers. [via phil ringnalda dot com]

    I’ve argued for ages that just escaping email addresses like this was an example of security through obscurity. Of course I’m sure spammers everywhere will now be looking to change this.

  • Reason #4 I Dig World of Warcraft

    One of the things I love best about World of Warcraft is its sense of humor and pop culture references. I started a new undead character today and while running through starting area ran across three zombies. Their names: Daniel Ulfman, Karrel Grayves, and Stephen Bhartec. Every once in a while Daniel says things like “You really couldn’t blame him…”, “No one lives forever…”, and “Where’s the rest of the guys?”

    I couldn’t stop chuckling about it the whole time I was playing. Brilliant.

    Edit: And I just had to kill Samual Fipps.

  • Mac Mini

    I’ve been a little quiet lately. Doing a bunch of reading and playing World of Warcraft. Somewhere in there Apple released the Mac Mini. I seriously want one. I’ve got an old B&W G3 it would replace just perfectly. I’d probably want the $599 one though. I kind of wish they offered a higher end one with the SuperDrive that wasn’t a custom build though.

    One thing I’ve found is that this has many numerous people I know who had been trying to avoid getting a mac finally take the plunge. Bout time Apple made a move like this. Btw, if you’re getting one, bump the memory up to at least 512MB if not a full gig. You’ll be happy you did.

  • World of Warcraft, First Impressions

    World of WarcraftSo I finally gave into the whole MMORPG craze. I’d played a bit of Asheron’s Call back when it was in Beta and enjoyed it. And even played a tiny bit when it was released, but it never really sucked me in that much. But I have a good number of friends playing World of Warcraft, and it’s one of the few games I can play on the Mac and still be able to play with them.

    First off. Big high-5 to Blizzard for releasing a game that runs on both Mac and PC beautifully. More companies need to do this. I have no idea how much extra effort it requires on their part but they really do a great job. Thank you for giving me something cool to play while all my friends are off playing CoH.

    So, about the game. It’s beautiful. I took some screenshots that are okay, but nothing as nice as some of the ones shown on the World of Warcraft site. The colors are vivid and for the first hour or so that I played the game i just kept looking all around me. I can’t wait to explore more and see what kinds of places I can find.

    World of Warcraft - screenshot 2
    Next, gameplay. I was pleasantly surprised to discover that this game was easy to learn. I saw the manual that came with the the game and was a little nervous at first. It’s not huge, but it just looked like there was so much to learn. So, in proper geek form I just dove right into the game. After about 10 min I created my character and was on my first quest.

    So far, I love the game. As I play a bit more and get a little deeper into it I’ll report back with more details. The screenshots are hosted at Flickr, and there is one other up there.

  • Would You?

    Marcus Ranum asks “Would you outsource your data center to Baghdad?“

    As I am writing this, US Marines and Iraqi troops are engaged in pacification operations (the nice word for “blowing the snot out of any resistance”) in the Iraqi town of Falluja. Perhaps by the time you read this Iraq will be a peaceful, stable democracy that offers a great climate for business, so this editorial might go out of date fairly quickly. Somehow, unfortunately, I doubt it. I suspect the climate for business in Iraq is going to be poor for the next few years, at least. So, mister CTO – would you outsource your data center to Baghdad?

    It’s an interesting read and something to think about. What country do you think you’d want to outsource stuff to?

  • Ramblings of a Cultist

    (Okay, before I get into this post I’ll admit that I’m a Mac user. I’ve been a sysadmin for over a decade and have had to maintain all variety of machines and OSes (From Suns to PCs to Macs). Up until the release of Mac OS X I honestly wouldn’t have considered getting a Mac, but now that I have one I am immensely happy with it. So my response to this is both as a sysadmin and as a Mac owner. Okay, on with the post.)

    Rich Brooks over at the Herald Tribune wrote a column about a FL school system’s decision to switch from Macs to PCs running Windows a week or so ago. At the time I read it and just kind of shrugged it off. He’s now written a second article talking about all the mails he got from the people in the Mac cult. So I thought I’d chime in (that’s what blogs are for, right?).

    As I read it, his original argument boiled down to this statement:

    But with PCs locking in 97 percent of the market, deciding what kind of computers to use in a school system is a no-brainer. [Rich Brookes]

    On the surface I agree that it looks to be a no-brainer. But I think there are more issues to look at than that. First off, the cost of this project is $7 million. I’m assuming that’s just the price of the hardware (though he doesn’t say). You’ve also got to figure that if your existing support staff don’t understand PCs they’ll either have to be retrained or replaced. You need all new versions of software. There may be various educational apps that have been in use that don’t exist on the PC, which means more spent on finding alternatives. I also believe that support costs for Windows are higher than OS X. I don’t have any data,this is based purely on the amount of times I’ve had to spend dealing with issues on each OS. And the number of sleepless nights each has given me.

    My biggest gripe with the first article is that he has no idea as to what the capabilities of the Mac are. He’s heard they don’t require as much maintenance, and that they are better for graphics and video. But he doesn’t know for sure.

    Needless to say, the Mac community went nuts over this article. Prompting Mr. Brooks to write a followup column: Revenge of the Mac user cult (and why they missed the point).

    Woe unto anyone who publicly questions the efficacy of Macintosh computers.

    You will be set upon by the cult of Mac users. They will call you names. They will tell your boss that you should be fired. They will write long letters and e-mails detailing the history of home computers. [Rich Brooks]

    Now I’ll be the first to admit that Mac users tend to be very zealous about their computers. I’ll even admit to a bit of it myself. I think they’ve done a great job breathing life back into the Macintosh line in the past few years. I’m someone who always hated having to give into the graphics people and go mac for them. But, I do agree that a lot of Mac users sometimes go a bit too far with their comments.

    While I don’t excuse that kind of behavior I can understand it. I can work with any operating system. Most do at least one or two things better than other operating systems. The problem I run into is that people refuse to even consider Macs most of the time. They don’t even want to think about trying it. So I think a lot of Mac users get annoyed when Macs are just dismissed without a second thought.

    I do think it would make for an interesting article if Mr. Brooks were to try out a Mac for a month and report back. I can’t say that there won’t be issues. I’m just as critical of OS X’s problems as I am with Windows. But I would like to think he’d be pleasantly suprised by the Mac.

    Oh, and floppy drives are dead. With those little USB drives being so cheap these days I can easily see the floppy drive becoming nonstandard on the PC within a year or so.